General Theory of Angular Momentum & Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients
Comprehensive mathematical exposition of quantum angular momentum: the Lie algebra of spatial rotations [Ji, Jj] = iħ εijk Jk, the Casimir invariant J², the abstract eigenvalue spectrum, finite-dimensional matrix representations, orbital angular momentum and spherical harmonics, Pauli spin matrices and SU(2) spinor transformations, the addition of two angular momenta, Clebsch-Gordan coupling coefficients, recursion relations, irreducible spherical tensor operators, and the Wigner-Eckart theorem.
§5.1 General Angular Momentum Algebra: Commutators, Casimir Invariant & Ladder Operators
1. The Quantum Lie Algebra of Rotations
In quantum mechanics, angular momentum operators are defined as the infinitesimal Hermitian generators of spatial rotations. An infinitesimal rotation by angle $d\phi$ about unit vector $\hat{n}$ acts on state kets via the unitary operator:
$$\hat{R}_{\hat{n}}(d\phi) = \hat{I} - \frac{i}{\hbar}(\hat{\vec{J}}\cdot\hat{n})\,d\phi$$The non-Abelian geometry of physical three-dimensional rotations requires that the components of the general angular momentum vector operator $\hat{\vec{J}} = (\hat{J}_x, \hat{J}_y, \hat{J}_z)$ satisfy the fundamental commutation relations:
$$[\hat{J}_i, \hat{J}_j] = i\hbar \sum_{k=1}^3 \epsilon_{ijk} \hat{J}_k \iff [\hat{J}_x, \hat{J}_y] = i\hbar \hat{J}_z, \quad [\hat{J}_y, \hat{J}_z] = i\hbar \hat{J}_x, \quad [\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_x] = i\hbar \hat{J}_y$$These commutation relations define the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2) \cong \mathfrak{so}(3)$.
2. The Casimir Invariant Operator $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$
The total angular momentum squared is defined as:
$$\hat{\vec{J}}^2 \equiv \hat{J}_x^2 + \hat{J}_y^2 + \hat{J}_z^2$$Evaluating the commutator with any Cartesian component $\hat{J}_k$:
$$[\hat{\vec{J}}^2, \hat{J}_z] = [\hat{J}_x^2, \hat{J}_z] + [\hat{J}_y^2, \hat{J}_z] + [\hat{J}_z^2, \hat{J}_z]$$ $$= \hat{J}_x[\hat{J}_x, \hat{J}_z] + [\hat{J}_x, \hat{J}_z]\hat{J}_x + \hat{J}_y[\hat{J}_y, \hat{J}_z] + [\hat{J}_y, \hat{J}_z]\hat{J}_y + 0$$ $$= -i\hbar(\hat{J}_x\hat{J}_y + \hat{J}_y\hat{J}_x) + i\hbar(\hat{J}_y\hat{J}_x + \hat{J}_x\hat{J}_y) = 0$$Hence, $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$ commutes with all three components: $[\hat{\vec{J}}^2, \hat{J}_i] = 0$. By Schur's lemma, $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$ is the quadratic Casimir invariant of the rotation group. A complete set of commuting observables (CSCO) can be chosen as $\{\hat{\vec{J}}^2, \hat{J}_z\}$.
3. Raising and Lowering Ladder Operators
We define the non-Hermitian ladder operators:
$$\hat{J}_+ \equiv \hat{J}_x + i\hat{J}_y, \quad \hat{J}_- \equiv \hat{J}_x - i\hat{J}_y = (\hat{J}_+)^\dagger$$Their commutation relations with $\hat{J}_z$ and $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$ are:
$$[\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_\pm] = [\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_x] \pm i[\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_y] = i\hbar\hat{J}_y \pm i(-i\hbar\hat{J}_x) = \pm\hbar(\hat{J}_x \pm i\hat{J}_y) = \pm\hbar \hat{J}_\pm$$ $$[\hat{\vec{J}}^2, \hat{J}_\pm] = 0$$Products of the ladder operators relate directly to $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$:
$$\hat{J}_\mp \hat{J}_\pm = (\hat{J}_x \mp i\hat{J}_y)(\hat{J}_x \pm i\hat{J}_y) = \hat{J}_x^2 + \hat{J}_y^2 \pm i[\hat{J}_x, \hat{J}_y] = \hat{\vec{J}}^2 - \hat{J}_z^2 \mp \hbar\hat{J}_z$$ $$\hat{\vec{J}}^2 = \hat{J}_- \hat{J}_+ + \hat{J}_z^2 + \hbar\hat{J}_z = \hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_- + \hat{J}_z^2 - \hbar\hat{J}_z$$§5.2 Eigenvalue Spectrum of J^2 and Jz & Finite-Dimensional Matrix Representations
1. Algebraic Derivation of the Quantum Numbers $j$ and $m$
Let $|j, m\rangle$ denote simultaneous normalized eigenstates of $\hat{\vec{J}}^2$ and $\hat{J}_z$:
$$\hat{\vec{J}}^2 |j, m\rangle = \lambda \hbar^2 |j, m\rangle, \quad \hat{J}_z |j, m\rangle = m\hbar |j, m\rangle$$Applying the commutator $[\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_\pm] = \pm\hbar\hat{J}_\pm$:
$$\hat{J}_z(\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle) = (\hat{J}_\pm\hat{J}_z + [\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_\pm])|j, m\rangle = (m\hbar \pm \hbar)(\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle) = (m \pm 1)\hbar(\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle)$$Thus, $\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle$ is an eigenstate of $\hat{J}_z$ with eigenvalue $(m \pm 1)\hbar$. Since $\langle j, m | \hat{\vec{J}}^2 - \hat{J}_z^2 | j, m \rangle = \langle j, m | \hat{J}_x^2 + \hat{J}_y^2 | j, m \rangle \ge 0$:
$$\lambda \hbar^2 - m^2\hbar^2 \ge 0 \implies m^2 \le \lambda$$Therefore, the spectrum of $m$ must be bounded from above by a maximum value $j$, and from below by a minimum value $j'$:
$$\hat{J}_+ |j, j\rangle = 0 \implies \hat{J}_- \hat{J}_+ |j, j\rangle = (\hat{\vec{J}}^2 - \hat{J}_z^2 - \hbar\hat{J}_z)|j, j\rangle = (\lambda - j^2 - j)\hbar^2 |j, j\rangle = 0 \implies \lambda = j(j+1)$$ $$\hat{J}_- |j, j'\rangle = 0 \implies \hat{J}_+ \hat{J}_- |j, j'\rangle = (\hat{\vec{J}}^2 - \hat{J}_z^2 + \hbar\hat{J}_z)|j, j'\rangle = (\lambda - j'^2 + j')\hbar^2 |j, j'\rangle = 0 \implies \lambda = j'(j'-1)$$Equating the two expressions for $\lambda$:
$$j(j+1) = j'(j'-1) \implies j' = -j$$Because one transitions from $-j$ to $+j$ in discrete integer steps of $+1$:
$$j - (-j) = 2j = k \in \mathbb{N}_0 \implies j \in \left\{0, \frac{1}{2}, 1, \frac{3}{2}, 2, \dots\right\}$$For a given $j$, the magnetic quantum number $m$ takes $2j+1$ distinct values:
$$m \in \{-j, -j+1, \dots, j-1, j\}$$2. Matrix Elements of Angular Momentum
Evaluating the normalization of $\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle$:
$$\|\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle\|^2 = \langle j, m | \hat{J}_\mp \hat{J}_\pm | j, m \rangle = \langle j, m | (\hat{\vec{J}}^2 - \hat{J}_z^2 \mp \hbar\hat{J}_z) | j, m \rangle = \hbar^2 [j(j+1) - m(m \pm 1)]$$Choosing the standard Condon-Shortley positive phase convention:
$$\hat{J}_\pm |j, m\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{j(j+1) - m(m \pm 1)} \, |j, m \pm 1\rangle$$The Cartesian matrix elements are:
$$\langle j, m' | \hat{J}_x | j, m \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\left[\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m+1)}\delta_{m', m+1} + \sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m-1)}\delta_{m', m-1}\right]$$ $$\langle j, m' | \hat{J}_y | j, m \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2i}\left[\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m+1)}\delta_{m', m+1} - \sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m-1)}\delta_{m', m-1}\right]$$ $$\langle j, m' | \hat{J}_z | j, m \rangle = m\hbar \delta_{m', m}$$§5.3 Orbital Angular Momentum in Spherical Coordinates & Spherical Harmonics
1. Differential Operators in Spherical Polar Coordinates
Orbital angular momentum is defined classically as $\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}$. In coordinate space, substituting $\hat{\vec{p}} = -i\hbar\nabla$:
$$\hat{\vec{L}} = -i\hbar(\vec{r} \times \nabla)$$In spherical polar coordinates $(r, \theta, \phi)$, the Cartesian components become:
$$\hat{L}_x = i\hbar\left(\sin\phi\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} + \cot\theta\cos\phi\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}\right)$$ $$\hat{L}_y = i\hbar\left(-\cos\phi\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} + \cot\theta\sin\phi\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}\right)$$ $$\hat{L}_z = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}$$The Casimir invariant $\hat{\vec{L}}^2$ takes the differential form:
$$\hat{\vec{L}}^2 = -\hbar^2\left[\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\left(\sin\theta\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\right) + \frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}\right]$$2. The Spherical Harmonics $Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi)$
The simultaneous eigenfunctions of $\hat{\vec{L}}^2$ and $\hat{L}_z$ are the spherical harmonics:
$$\hat{\vec{L}}^2 Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) = l(l+1)\hbar^2 Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi), \quad \hat{L}_z Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) = m\hbar Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi)$$Separating variables, $Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) = \Theta_{lm}(\theta)\Phi_m(\phi)$:
$$\hat{L}_z \Phi_m(\phi) = -i\hbar\frac{d\Phi_m}{d\phi} = m\hbar\Phi_m(\phi) \implies \Phi_m(\phi) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{im\phi}$$The single-valuedness requirement $\Phi_m(\phi + 2\pi) = \Phi_m(\phi)$ restricts $m$ strictly to integers ($m \in \mathbb{Z}$). Consequently, orbital angular momentum quantum numbers must be strictly integer-valued:
$$l \in \{0, 1, 2, 3, \dots\}, \quad m \in \{-l, -l+1, \dots, +l\}$$The $\theta$-dependent factor solves the associated Legendre differential equation:
$$Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) = (-1)^m \sqrt{\frac{2l+1}{4\pi}\frac{(l-m)!}{(l+m)!}} P_l^m(\cos\theta) e^{im\phi}$$Orthonormality over the unit sphere is:
$$\int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_0^\pi \sin\theta\,d\theta \, Y_{l'm'}^*(\theta, \phi) Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) = \delta_{l'l}\delta_{m'm}$$§5.4 Spin Angular Momentum: Spin-1/2 Algebra, Pauli Matrices & Spinor Transformations
1. The Spin-1/2 Degree of Freedom
Unlike orbital angular momentum, which describes spatial motion and is restricted to integer eigenvalues, elementary particles possess an intrinsic angular momentum termed spin $\hat{\vec{S}}$ with half-integer quantum numbers. For electrons, protons, and neutrons, $s = 1/2$.
In the two-dimensional Hilbert space spanned by the basis states $\{|+\rangle, |-\rangle\} \equiv \{|\uparrow\rangle, |\downarrow\rangle\}$, the spin operator is represented in terms of the dimensionless Pauli spin matrices $\vec{\sigma} = (\sigma_x, \sigma_y, \sigma_z)$:
$$\hat{\vec{S}} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\vec{\sigma}$$ $$\sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$$2. Algebraic Properties of Pauli Matrices
The Pauli matrices satisfy the fundamental product identity:
$$\sigma_i \sigma_j = \delta_{ij}\hat{I} + i\sum_k \epsilon_{ijk} \sigma_k$$From this identity directly follow their anticommutation and commutation relations:
$$\{\sigma_i, \sigma_j\} = \sigma_i \sigma_j + \sigma_j \sigma_i = 2\delta_{ij}\hat{I}$$ $$[\sigma_i, \sigma_j] = \sigma_i \sigma_j - \sigma_j \sigma_i = 2i\sum_k \epsilon_{ijk} \sigma_k$$Additionally: $\sigma_i^2 = \hat{I}$, $\text{Tr}(\sigma_i) = 0$, and $\det(\sigma_i) = -1$.
3. Finite Rotations and the 4π Spinor Symmetry
A finite rotation of a spin-1/2 state by angle $\theta$ about unit axis $\hat{n}$ is represented by the $2\times 2$ unitary matrix $\hat{U}(\hat{n}, \theta) = \exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{\vec{S}}\cdot\hat{n}\theta\right) = \exp\left(-\frac{i\theta}{2}(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})\right)$. Expanding the matrix exponential:
$$\exp\left(-\frac{i\theta}{2}(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})\right) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\left(-\frac{i\theta}{2}\right)^k (\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})^k$$Since $(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})^2 = \hat{I}$, even powers yield $\cos(\theta/2)$ and odd powers yield $-i(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})\sin(\theta/2)$:
$$\hat{U}(\hat{n}, \theta) = \cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\hat{I} - i(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})\sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)$$For a complete $2\pi$ spatial rotation ($\theta = 2\pi$):
$$\hat{U}(\hat{n}, 2\pi) = \cos(\pi)\hat{I} - i(\vec{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n})\sin(\pi) = -\hat{I}$$A rotation by $360^\circ$ inverts the sign of a fermion spinor ket: $|\psi\rangle \to -|\psi\rangle$. A full $4\pi$ ($720^\circ$) rotation is required to return the state vector to its original mathematical identity, demonstrating the double-covering topology $\text{SU}(2) \to \text{SO}(3)$ verified by neutron interferometry.
§5.5 Addition of Two Angular Momenta: Uncoupled vs Coupled Representation Bases
1. The Composite Two-Particle Hilbert Space
Consider a composite quantum system consisting of two independent angular momenta $\hat{\vec{J}}_1$ and $\hat{\vec{J}}_2$ acting in Hilbert spaces $\mathcal{H}_1$ and $\mathcal{H}_2$ of dimensions $(2j_1+1)$ and $(2j_2+1)$. Because they act on distinct degrees of freedom, their operators commute:
$$[\hat{J}_{1i}, \hat{J}_{2j}] = 0 \quad \forall i, j$$The total angular momentum operator is the vector sum:
$$\hat{\vec{J}} = \hat{\vec{J}}_1 + \hat{\vec{J}}_2 \equiv \hat{\vec{J}}_1 \otimes \hat{I}_2 + \hat{I}_1 \otimes \hat{\vec{J}}_2$$The total operator $\hat{\vec{J}}$ satisfies the standard rotation Lie algebra $[\hat{J}_i, \hat{J}_j] = i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk} \hat{J}_k$.
2. The Uncoupled Basis
The uncoupled basis diagonalizes the four mutually commuting operators $\{\hat{\vec{J}}_1^2, \hat{J}_{1z}, \hat{\vec{J}}_2^2, \hat{J}_{2z}\}$:
$$|j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2\rangle \equiv |j_1, m_1\rangle \otimes |j_2, m_2\rangle$$The dimension of the product space is:
$$N = (2j_1 + 1)(2j_2 + 1)$$3. The Coupled Basis and Triangle Inequality
Alternatively, the coupled basis diagonalizes the complete set of commuting observables $\{\hat{\vec{J}}_1^2, \hat{\vec{J}}_2^2, \hat{\vec{J}}^2, \hat{J}_z\}$, denoted by $|J, M; j_1, j_2\rangle$ (or simply $|J, M\rangle$ when $j_1, j_2$ are fixed):
$$\hat{\vec{J}}^2 |J, M\rangle = J(J+1)\hbar^2 |J, M\rangle, \quad \hat{J}_z |J, M\rangle = M\hbar |J, M\rangle$$Since $\hat{J}_z = \hat{J}_{1z} + \hat{J}_{2z}$, the magnetic quantum number is strictly additive:
$$M = m_1 + m_2$$The allowed values of total angular momentum $J$ satisfy the triangle rule:
$$|j_1 - j_2| \le J \le j_1 + j_2$$with $J$ stepping by integers from $|j_1 - j_2|$ to $j_1 + j_2$. We verify conservation of total dimensionality:
$$\sum_{J=|j_1-j_2|}^{j_1+j_2} (2J + 1) = (2j_1 + 1)(2j_2 + 1)$$§5.6 Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients: Phase Conventions, Ladder Construction & Tabulation
1. Definition of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients
The unitary transformation connecting the uncoupled and coupled bases is mediated by the Clebsch-Gordan (CG) coefficients:
$$|J, M\rangle = \sum_{m_1=-j_1}^{j_1} \sum_{m_2=-j_2}^{j_2} \langle j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2 | J, M \rangle |j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2\rangle$$The CG coefficients $\langle j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2 | J, M \rangle$ are the projection overlaps between the two bases. They satisfy two fundamental selection rules:
- $M = m_1 + m_2$ (otherwise the coefficient is identically zero).
- $|j_1 - j_2| \le J \le j_1 + j_2$ (triangle inequality).
2. Orthonormality and Phase Conventions
Because the change of basis is a unitary transformation, the CG coefficients satisfy dual completeness relations:
$$\sum_{m_1, m_2} \langle J, M | j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2 \rangle \langle j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2 | J', M' \rangle = \delta_{JJ'}\delta_{MM'}$$ $$\sum_{J, M} \langle j_1, m_1; j_2, m_2 | J, M \rangle \langle J, M | j_1, m_1'; j_2, m_2' \rangle = \delta_{m_1 m_1'}\delta_{m_2 m_2'}$$Under the standard Condon-Shortley phase convention:
- All Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are chosen to be strictly real.
- The highest state $\langle j_1, j_1; j_2, J - j_1 | J, J \rangle > 0$ is chosen to be strictly positive.
3. Construction via Lowering Ladder Operators
The construction begins by identifying the unique state of maximum total angular momentum:
$$|J_{\max}, M_{\max}\rangle = |j_1 + j_2, j_1 + j_2\rangle = |j_1, j_1; j_2, j_2\rangle$$Applying the lowering operator $\hat{J}_- = \hat{J}_{1-} + \hat{J}_{2-}$ to both sides generates $|j_1+j_2, j_1+j_2-1\rangle$:
$$\hbar\sqrt{(j_1+j_2)(j_1+j_2+1) - (j_1+j_2)(j_1+j_2-1)}|j_1+j_2, j_1+j_2-1\rangle = (\hat{J}_{1-} + \hat{J}_{2-})|j_1, j_1; j_2, j_2\rangle$$ $$\sqrt{2(j_1+j_2)}|j_1+j_2, j_1+j_2-1\rangle = \sqrt{2j_1}|j_1-1, j_1; j_2, j_2\rangle + \sqrt{2j_2}|j_1, j_1; j_2-1, j_2\rangle$$The orthogonal state with the same $M = j_1 + j_2 - 1$ corresponds to the state $|j_1+j_2-1, j_1+j_2-1\rangle$. Lowering operators are then iteratively applied to generate all lower $M$ states.
§5.7 Irreducible Spherical Tensors & The Wigner-Eckart Theorem: Matrix Selection Rules
1. Spherical Tensor Operators
An irreducible spherical tensor operator of rank $k$, denoted by $\hat{T}_q^{(k)}$ (with $q = -k, -k+1, \dots, +k$), is defined by its commutation relations with the angular momentum operators:
$$[\hat{J}_z, \hat{T}_q^{(k)}] = q\hbar \hat{T}_q^{(k)}$$ $$[\hat{J}_\pm, \hat{T}_q^{(k)}] = \hbar\sqrt{k(k+1) - q(q \pm 1)} \, \hat{T}_{q \pm 1}^{(k)}$$Under spatial rotations, the $2k+1$ components of $\hat{T}_q^{(k)}$ transform among themselves identically to the angular momentum eigenstates $|k, q\rangle$.
Examples:
- Rank 0 (Scalar Operator $\hat{S}$): $[\hat{\vec{J}}, \hat{S}] = 0$ (e.g., $\hat{\vec{r}}^2, \hat{\vec{p}}^2, \hat{H}$).
- Rank 1 (Vector Operator $\hat{\vec{V}}$): Related to Cartesian components by $\hat{T}_0^{(1)} = \hat{V}_z, \hat{T}_{\pm 1}^{(1)} = \mp \frac{\hat{V}_x \pm i\hat{V}_y}{\sqrt{2}}$.
- Rank 2 (Quadrupole Tensor): Electric quadrupole moments $Q_{ij} = 3x_i x_j - r^2 \delta_{ij}$.
2. The Wigner-Eckart Theorem
The Wigner-Eckart Theorem states that the matrix element of an irreducible spherical tensor operator between angular momentum eigenstates factors into two independent terms:
$$\langle j', m' | \hat{T}_q^{(k)} | j, m \rangle = \frac{\langle j, m; k, q | j', m' \rangle}{\sqrt{2j' + 1}} \langle j' \| \hat{T}^{(k)} \| j \rangle$$where:
- $\langle j, m; k, q | j', m' \rangle$ is a standard Clebsch-Gordan coefficient carrying all dependence on the magnetic projection quantum numbers $m, m', q$ (geometric orientation).
- $\langle j' \| \hat{T}^{(k)} \| j \rangle$ is the reduced matrix element, which depends solely on the physical dynamics and radial integrals, completely independent of $m, m', q$.
3. Selection Rules from the Wigner-Eckart Theorem
Because the CG coefficient vanishes unless the coupling conditions are met:
- $m' = m + q \iff \Delta m = q$.
- $|j - k| \le j' \le j + k$ (triangle rule between initial angular momentum $j$, tensor rank $k$, and final angular momentum $j'$).
For a scalar operator ($k = 0, q = 0$): $\langle j', m' | \hat{S} | j, m \rangle \propto \delta_{j'j}\delta_{m'm}$.
Consider a system of two spin-1/2 particles ($s_1 = 1/2, s_2 = 1/2$).\n(a) Using lowering operators, construct all four coupled states $|S, M_S\rangle$ in terms of the uncoupled basis $\{|\uparrow\uparrow\rangle, |\uparrow\downarrow\rangle, |\downarrow\uparrow\rangle, |\downarrow\downarrow\rangle\}$.\n(b) Identify the total spin $S = 1$ (triplet) and $S = 0$ (singlet) states and discuss their exchange symmetry under particle permutation $\hat{P}_{12}$.\n(c) Evaluate the expectation value of the spin exchange operator $\hat{\vec{S}}_1 \cdot \hat{\vec{S}}_2$ in both the singlet and triplet states.
(a) Constructing Coupled States:\nThe uncoupled states are $|\uparrow\uparrow\rangle, |\uparrow\downarrow\rangle, |\downarrow\uparrow\rangle, |\downarrow\downarrow\rangle$.\nThe allowed total spin values are $S \in \{1/2 - 1/2, 1/2 + 1/2\} = \{0, 1\}$.\n1. State of maximum total spin ($S = 1, M_S = 1$):\n
\n2. Applying total lowering operator $\hat{S}_- = \hat{S}_{1-} + \hat{S}_{2-}$:\n
\n
\n
\n3. Lowering once more:\n
\n4. The singlet state $|0, 0\rangle$ must have $M_S = 0$ and be orthogonal to $|1, 0\rangle$:\n
\n\n(b) Exchange Symmetry:\nUnder particle interchange operator $\hat{P}_{12}$ ($1 \leftrightarrow 2$):\n- Triplet states ($S = 1$):\n
\n
\n
\n All $S = 1$ triplet states are symmetric under permutation.\n- Singlet state ($S = 0$):\n
\n The $S = 0$ singlet state is antisymmetric under permutation.\n\n(c) Spin Dot Product Expectation Values:\n
\n
\nFor spin-1/2: $\hat{\vec{S}}_1^2 = \hat{\vec{S}}_2^2 = \frac{3}{4}\hbar^2$:\n
\n- For Triplet ($S = 1$):\n
\n- For Singlet ($S = 0$):\n
Complete analytical derivation provided above.
A particle with orbital angular momentum $l = 1$ and spin $s = 1/2$ has total angular momentum $\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{S}$.\n(a) What are the possible values of the total angular momentum quantum number $j$?\n(b) Express the coupled state $|j = 3/2, m_j = 1/2\rangle$ and state $|j = 1/2, m_j = 1/2\rangle$ in terms of the uncoupled basis $|m_l, m_s\rangle$.\n(c) Deduce the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients $\langle 1, 0; 1/2, 1/2 | 3/2, 1/2 \rangle$ and $\langle 1, 1; 1/2, -1/2 | 3/2, 1/2 \rangle$.
(a) Allowed Values of $j$:\n
\nTotal number of states: $(2(3/2)+1) + (2(1/2)+1) = 4 + 2 = 6 = (2l+1)(2s+1)$.\n\n(b) Constructing the Coupled States:\n1. State of maximum angular momentum ($j = 3/2, m_j = 3/2$):\n
\n2. Applying $\hat{J}_- = \hat{L}_- + \hat{S}_-$:\n
\n
\n
\n
\n Dividing by $\sqrt{3}\hbar$:\n
\n3. The state $|1/2, 1/2\rangle$ has the same $m_j = 1/2$ but must be orthogonal to $|3/2, 1/2\rangle$ with positive phase for the highest $m_l$ term:\n
\n\n(c) Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients:\nFrom the expansion of $|3/2, 1/2\rangle$:\n
\n
\nNotice the sum of squared coefficients: $(\sqrt{2/3})^2 + (1/\sqrt{3})^2 = 2/3 + 1/3 = 1$.
Complete analytical derivation provided above.
A spherical tensor dipole operator $\hat{T}_q^{(1)}$ connects states of an angular momentum multiplet with $j = 1$ to states with $j' = 2$.\n(a) Using the Wigner-Eckart theorem, relate the matrix element $\langle 2, 1 | \hat{T}_1^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle$ and $\langle 2, 0 | \hat{T}_0^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle$ to the reduced matrix element $\langle 2 \| \hat{T}^{(1)} \| 1 \rangle$.\n(b) Compute the ratio $\frac{\langle 2, 1 | \hat{T}_1^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle}{\langle 2, 0 | \hat{T}_0^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle}$ using the relevant Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.\n(c) Explain why $\langle 2, 2 | \hat{T}_0^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle = 0$.
(a) Wigner-Eckart Decomposition:\nBy the Wigner-Eckart theorem:\n
\nFor $j = 1, k = 1, j' = 2$ ($2j'+1 = 5$):\n
\n
\n\n(b) Ratio of Matrix Elements:\nThe reduced matrix elements cancel completely in the ratio:\n
\nUsing standard Clebsch-Gordan values:\n
\n
\nTherefore:\n
\nThe ratio of physical transition amplitudes is determined entirely by the geometry of angular momentum!\n\n(c) Vanishing Matrix Element:\nFor $\langle 2, 2 | \hat{T}_0^{(1)} | 1, 0 \rangle$, the magnetic quantum numbers are $m = 0, q = 0$, giving $m + q = 0 \ne m' = 2$. By the magnetic selection rule ($m' = m + q$), the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient $\langle 1, 0; 1, 0 | 2, 2 \rangle$ is identically zero. Thus, the matrix element vanishes.
Complete analytical derivation provided above.
Solved University Examination Problems
Step-by-step mathematical solutions to classic university honors examination questions.