Physics / Nuclear Physics II Hadron Symmetries & Nuclear Forces 100% Free Open Access
Chapter 5 • Theory & Derivations

Nuclear Structure Models: Advanced Shell Model & Collective Dynamics

Microscopic and collective nuclear structure: degenerate Fermi gas model, 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator and Woods-Saxon central potentials, Maria Goeppert Mayer and J. Hans D. Jensen strong inverted spin-orbit coupling V_{so}(r) L·S, complete derivation of the nuclear magic numbers (2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126), single-particle state predictions for odd-A and odd-odd nuclei (Nordheim rules), nuclear magnetic moments and Schmidt limits, collective Bohr-Mottelson quadrupole/octupole vibrations, deformed Nilsson mean field [N n_z Λ]Ω^π, rotational bands with characteristic E(4⁺)/E(2⁺) ≈ 3.33 energy ratios, and high-spin Coriolis backbending.

§5.1 Nuclear Mean Field & The Degenerate Fermi Gas Model

1. The Independent Particle Mean Field Approximation

Although the bare nucleon-nucleon interaction contains strong repulsive cores and tensor components, inside a many-nucleon nucleus each nucleon moves predominantly in an average, smooth, spherically symmetric mean-field potential $V_{\text{MF}}(\vec{r})$ created by the collective action of all other $A-1$ nucleons:

$$\hat{H} = \sum_{i=1}^A \left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\nabla_i^2 + V_{\text{MF}}(\vec{r}_i) \right] + \hat{V}_{\text{residual}}$$

This independent-particle motion is made possible by the Pauli exclusion principle: when two nucleons collide inside a nucleus, the states into which they could scatter are already occupied by other nucleons, suppressing short-range collisions and imparting nucleons with long mean free paths ($\lambda_{\text{mfp}} \gg R$).

2. The Degenerate Nuclear Fermi Gas Model

As the simplest microscopic mean-field model, consider protons and neutrons as two independent, non-interacting ideal Fermi gases confined within a spherical nuclear volume $V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3 = \frac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3 A$ of constant density $\rho_0 \approx 0.16\text{ fm}^{-3}$.

Each nucleon state occupies a phase space volume of $h^3 = (2\pi\hbar)^3$. For $Z$ protons and $N$ neutrons with spin degeneracy $g = 2$:

$$N = 2 \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} \int_0^{k_{F,n}} 4\pi k^2 dk = \frac{V}{\pi^2} \frac{k_{F,n}^3}{3} \implies k_{F,n} = \left( 3\pi^2 \rho_n \right)^{1/3}$$ $$Z = 2 \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} \int_0^{k_{F,p}} 4\pi k^2 dk = \frac{V}{\pi^2} \frac{k_{F,p}^3}{3} \implies k_{F,p} = \left( 3\pi^2 \rho_p \right)^{1/3}$$

For a symmetric nucleus with $N = Z = A/2$ and $\rho_n = \rho_p = \rho_0 / 2 \approx 0.08\text{ fm}^{-3}$:

$$k_F = \left( 3\pi^2 \frac{\rho_0}{2} \right)^{1/3} = \left( \frac{3\pi^2}{2} \times 0.16 \right)^{1/3} = (2.3687)^{1/3} \approx 1.33\text{ to }1.36\text{ fm}^{-1}$$

The maximum kinetic energy at absolute zero is the Fermi Energy $E_F$:

$$E_F = \frac{\hbar^2 k_F^2}{2 M} = \frac{(197.3\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm})^2 (1.36\text{ fm}^{-1})^2}{2(938.9\text{ MeV})} = \frac{38938 \times 1.8496}{1877.8} \approx 38.35\text{ MeV}$$

Because nucleons are bound by an average separation energy $B/A \approx 8\text{ MeV}$, the total potential well depth $V_0$ must be:

$$V_0 = E_F + B \approx 38\text{ MeV} + 8\text{ MeV} \approx 46\text{ MeV}$$

The average kinetic energy per nucleon is $\langle E_k \rangle = \frac{3}{5} E_F \approx 23\text{ MeV}$.

§5.2 Central Potentials: 3D Harmonic Oscillator vs Woods-Saxon Diffuse Well

1. The 3D Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator Potential

An analytically solvable model for the nuclear mean field is the 3D harmonic oscillator:

$$V_{\text{HO}}(r) = -V_0 + \frac{1}{2} M \omega^2 r^2$$

The energy eigenvalues are governed by the principal oscillator quantum number $N_{\text{osc}} = 2(n - 1) + l = 0, 1, 2, 3, \dots$:

$$E_N = \left( N_{\text{osc}} + \frac{3}{2} \right) \hbar\omega$$

where the standard empirical oscillator frequency scales with mass number as $\hbar\omega \approx 41 A^{-1/3}\text{ MeV}$.

The degeneracies of the harmonic oscillator shells are:

  • $N_{\text{osc}} = 0$: $1s$ (Degeneracy $2$) $\implies$ Cumulative: **2**
  • $N_{\text{osc}} = 1$: $1p$ (Degeneracy $6$) $\implies$ Cumulative: **8**
  • $N_{\text{osc}} = 2$: $1d, 2s$ (Degeneracy $10 + 2 = 12$) $\implies$ Cumulative: **20**
  • $N_{\text{osc}} = 3$: $1f, 2p$ (Degeneracy $14 + 6 = 20$) $\implies$ Cumulative: **40** (Not 28!)
  • $N_{\text{osc}} = 4$: $1g, 2d, 3s$ (Degeneracy $18 + 10 + 2 = 30$) $\implies$ Cumulative: **70** (Not 50!)

The harmonic oscillator correctly predicts the first three magic numbers ($2, 8, 20$), but completely fails to explain the higher magic numbers ($28, 50, 82, 126$).

2. The Realistic Woods-Saxon Potential

In real nuclei, the nuclear density is constant in the interior and drops smoothly to zero at the surface over a skin thickness $t \approx 2.4\text{ fm}$. This is modeled by the Woods-Saxon potential:

$$V_{\text{WS}}(r) = -\frac{V_0}{1 + \exp\left( \frac{r - R}{a} \right)}$$

where $V_0 \approx 50\text{ MeV}$, $R = R_0 A^{1/3} \approx 1.25 A^{1/3}\text{ fm}$, and diffuseness $a \approx 0.65\text{ fm}$.

Because the Woods-Saxon potential is flatter at the center and steeper at the surface than a parabola, it lifts the $l$-degeneracy: states with higher orbital angular momentum $l$ have wavefunctions concentrated closer to the surface and are pulled downward in energy relative to lower-$l$ states. However, even with this flattening, the magic numbers beyond 20 cannot be explained without spin-orbit coupling.

§5.3 Mayer-Jensen Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling & Nuclear Magic Numbers

1. The Inverted Nuclear Spin-Orbit Interaction

In 1949, Maria Goeppert Mayer and independently J. Hans D. Jensen (Nobel Prize 1963) solved the mystery of the magic numbers by introducing a powerful, relativistic spin-orbit potential into the nuclear mean field:

$$V(r) = V_{\text{WS}}(r) + V_{so}(r) \vec{l}\cdot\vec{s}$$

where $V_{so}(r) = -V_{so}^{(0)} \frac{1}{r}\frac{dV_{\text{WS}}}{dr}$ is concentrated entirely at the nuclear surface.

Evaluating the operator $\vec{l}\cdot\vec{s}$ from total single-particle angular momentum $\vec{j} = \vec{l} + \vec{s}$:

$$\vec{j}^2 = \vec{l}^2 + \vec{s}^2 + 2\vec{l}\cdot\vec{s} \implies \vec{l}\cdot\vec{s} = \frac{1}{2}\left[ j(j+1) - l(l+1) - s(s+1) \right]$$

For nucleon spin $s = 1/2$, the allowed total angular momenta are $j = l + 1/2$ and $j = l - 1/2$:

$$\langle \vec{l}\cdot\vec{s} \rangle = \begin{cases} +\frac{1}{2} l, & j = l + 1/2 \text{ (spin parallel to orbit)} \\ -\frac{1}{2}(l + 1), & j = l - 1/2 \text{ (spin antiparallel to orbit)} \end{cases}$$

The energy splitting between the two members of the spin-orbit doublet is:

$$\Delta E_{so} = E(j = l - 1/2) - E(j = l + 1/2) = \frac{2l + 1}{2} \langle V_{so} \rangle$$

CRITICAL PHYSICAL DISTINCTION FROM ATOMIC PHYSICS: In atomic physics, spin-orbit coupling is positive ($+\vec{L}\cdot\vec{S}$), placing $j = l - 1/2$ lower in energy. In nuclear physics, the spin-orbit interaction is strongly attractive and negative: the state with $j = l + 1/2$ is pushed dramatically DOWNWARD in energy.

2. The Exact Generation of the Magic Numbers

Because $\Delta E_{so} \propto (2l + 1)$, the splitting grows enormously with orbital angular momentum $l$:

  • In the $N_{\text{osc}} = 3$ shell ($1f, 2p$), the $1f_{7/2}$ state ($j = 3 + 1/2$) is pushed downward so strongly that it detaches from the shell and joins the lower shell. With its capacity of $2j + 1 = 8$ nucleons, adding it to $20$ produces the magic number: $$\mathbf{20 + 8 = 28}$$
  • In the $N_{\text{osc}} = 4$ shell, the intruder state $1g_{9/2}$ ($2j + 1 = 10$) plunges downward across the major shell gap. Adding it to $40$ yields: $$\mathbf{40 + 10 = 50}$$
  • In the $N_{\text{osc}} = 5$ shell, the intruder state $1h_{11/2}$ ($2j + 1 = 12$) plunges downward. Adding it to $70$ yields: $$\mathbf{70 + 12 = 82}$$
  • In the $N_{\text{osc}} = 6$ shell, the intruder state $1i_{13/2}$ ($2j + 1 = 14$) plunges downward. Adding it to $112$ yields: $$\mathbf{112 + 14 = 126}$$

The complete sequence of nuclear magic numbers is rigorously explained:

$$\mathbf{2, \quad 8, \quad 20, \quad 28, \quad 50, \quad 82, \quad 126}$$

Nuclei with both $Z$ and $N$ equal to magic numbers (${}^4_2\text{He}_2$, ${}^{16}_8\text{O}_8$, ${}^{40}_{20}\text{Ca}_{20}$, ${}^{48}_{20}\text{Ca}_{28}$, ${}^{208}_{82}\text{Pb}_{126}$) are doubly magic, exhibiting exceptional stability, spherical symmetry, high excitation thresholds, and tiny neutron capture cross sections.

§5.4 Single-Particle Shell Predictions: Spins, Parities & Nordheim's Rules

1. Ground-State Spin and Parity for Even-Even and Odd-A Nuclei

The Extreme Single-Particle Shell Model (ESPM) provides robust rules for determining ground-state spins and parities $J^\pi$:

  1. Even-Even Nuclei ($Z$ even, $N$ even): All protons pair up in time-reversed orbits with opposite magnetic quantum numbers ($|j, m\rangle$ and $|j, -m\rangle$), and all neutrons pair up identically. The net spin and parity for all even-even ground states without exception is: $$J^\pi = 0^+$$
  2. Odd-$A$ Nuclei ($Z$ odd, $N$ even or $Z$ even, $N$ odd): All even nucleons pair off to $J = 0^+$. The total spin and parity of the nucleus are determined entirely by the single unpaired valence nucleon occupying the state $n l_j$: $$J = j_{\text{val}}, \qquad \pi = (-1)^{l_{\text{val}}}$$ Examples:
    • ${}^{17}_8\text{O}_9$: $Z=8$ is magic; $N=9$ has one valence neutron in $1d_{5/2}$ ($l=2$). Predicts $J^\pi = 5/2^+$. (Experiment: $5/2^+$).
    • ${}^{41}_{20}\text{Ca}_{21}$: $Z=20$ is magic; $N=21$ has one valence neutron in $1f_{7/2}$ ($l=3$). Predicts $J^\pi = 7/2^-$. (Experiment: $7/2^-$).
    • ${}^{207}_{82}\text{Pb}_{125}$: $Z=82$ is magic; $N=125$ has a single neutron hole in $3p_{1/2}$ ($l=1$). Predicts $J^\pi = 1/2^-$. (Experiment: $1/2^-$).

2. Odd-Odd Nuclei & Nordheim's Coupling Rules

For nuclei with both $Z$ odd and $N$ odd, the spin arises from the vector coupling of the unpaired proton $(j_p, l_p)$ and unpaired neutron $(j_n, l_n)$:

$$|j_p - j_n| \le J \le j_p + j_n, \qquad \pi = (-1)^{l_p + l_n}$$

The precise value of $J$ is predicted by Nordheim's empirical coupling rules, governed by the Nordheim number $\mathcal{N} \equiv (j_p - l_p) + (j_n - l_n)$:

  • Strong Rule ($\mathcal{N} = 0$, intrinsic spins parallel): $$J = |j_p - j_n|$$ Example: ${}^{38}_{17}\text{Cl}_{21}$: Proton hole in $1d_{3/2}$ ($j_p = 3/2, l_p = 2 \implies j_p - l_p = -1/2$). Valence neutron in $1f_{7/2}$ ($j_n = 7/2, l_n = 3 \implies j_n - l_n = +1/2$). Here $\mathcal{N} = -1/2 + 1/2 = 0$. Predicts $J = |3/2 - 7/2| = 2$. Parity $\pi = (-1)^{2+3} = -1$. Predicts $J^\pi = 2^-$. (Experiment: $2^-$).
  • Weak Rule ($\mathcal{N} = \pm 1$, intrinsic spins antiparallel): $$J \text{ is intermediate: tends toward } |j_p + j_n| \text{ or } |j_p - j_n|$$

§5.5 Nuclear Magnetic Moments, Schmidt Limits & Core Polarization

1. Derivation of the Schmidt Single-Particle Magnetic Moments

In the extreme single-particle model of an odd-$A$ nucleus, the total magnetic dipole moment is generated entirely by the single valence nucleon with orbital angular momentum $\vec{l}$ and spin $\vec{s}$:

$$\vec{\mu} = \left( g_l \vec{l} + g_s \vec{s} \right) \mu_N$$

Projecting along the total angular momentum $\vec{j} = \vec{l} + \vec{s}$ in the state $m_j = j$:

$$\mu = \langle j, m_j=j | \mu_z | j, m_j=j \rangle = \frac{\langle \vec{\mu}\cdot\vec{j} \rangle}{j+1}$$

Evaluating $\vec{l}\cdot\vec{j} = \frac{j(j+1) + l(l+1) - 3/4}{2}$ and $\vec{s}\cdot\vec{j} = \frac{j(j+1) - l(l+1) + 3/4}{2}$:

  • Case I: $j = l + 1/2$ (Spin Parallel to Orbit): $$\mu = \left[ (j - 1/2) g_l + \frac{1}{2} g_s \right] \mu_N$$
  • Case II: $j = l - 1/2$ (Spin Antiparallel to Orbit): $$\mu = \frac{j}{j+1} \left[ (j + 3/2) g_l - \frac{1}{2} g_s \right] \mu_N$$

Substituting bare nucleon $g$-factors ($g_l = 1, g_s = +5.586$ for proton; $g_l = 0, g_s = -3.826$ for neutron) yields the four classic Schmidt lines:

$$\text{Odd Proton: } \mu = \begin{cases} j + 2.293\text{ }\mu_N, & j = l + 1/2 \\ j - 2.293\frac{j}{j+1}\text{ }\mu_N, & j = l - 1/2 \end{cases}$$ $$\text{Odd Neutron: } \mu = \begin{cases} -1.913\text{ }\mu_N, & j = l + 1/2 \\ +1.913\frac{j}{j+1}\text{ }\mu_N, & j = l - 1/2 \end{cases}$$

2. The Schmidt Plots & Core Polarization Quenching

When experimental magnetic moments are plotted as a function of nuclear spin $j$ (the Schmidt plots), almost all experimental points lie between the two Schmidt lines, but rarely right on them.

This quenching of empirical magnetic moments is caused by:

  1. Core Polarization: The magnetic moment of the valence nucleon polarizes the time-reversed nucleon pairs in the closed core via the residual spin-spin and tensor interactions, inducing an opposing core magnetic moment.
  2. Meson Exchange Currents: Virtual charged pions in flight between nucleons alter the effective $g$-factors inside the nuclear medium ($g_s^{\text{eff}} \approx 0.7\text{ to }0.8\text{ }g_s^{\text{bare}}$).

§5.6 Collective Liquid Drop Vibrations & The Phonon Spectrum

1. Multipole Expansion of the Nuclear Surface

Near closed shells, nuclei are spherical in their ground states, but can undergo collective surface vibrations described by the Bohr-Mottelson collective model. The instantaneous nuclear radius in direction $(\theta, \phi)$ is expanded in spherical harmonics:

$$R(\theta, \phi, t) = R_0 \left[ 1 + \sum_{\lambda=0}^\infty \sum_{\mu=-\lambda}^\lambda \alpha_{\lambda\mu}(t) Y_{\lambda\mu}^*(\theta, \phi) \right]$$

Physical modes of oscillation:

  • $\lambda = 0$ (Monopole / Breathing Mode): Compresses the nuclear fluid, requiring immense symmetry energy ($\hbar\omega \approx 80 A^{-1/3}\text{ MeV}$).
  • $\lambda = 1$ (Dipole Mode): Pure center-of-mass translation (no internal excitation for isoscalar motion; for isovector motion, it is the Giant Dipole Resonance).
  • $\lambda = 2$ (Quadrupole Mode): Lowest true shape vibration. Deforms sphere into prolate and oblate spheroids with five collective degrees of freedom $\alpha_{2\mu}$.
  • $\lambda = 3$ (Octupole Mode): Pear-shaped deformation with negative parity ($J^\pi = 3^-$).

2. The Quadrupole Harmonic Vibrator Spectrum

Quantizing the collective Hamiltonian $\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2} B_2 \sum |\dot{\alpha}_{2\mu}|^2 + \frac{1}{2} C_2 \sum |\alpha_{2\mu}|^2$ yields harmonic quadrupole phonons carrying angular momentum $\lambda = 2$ and positive parity $\pi = +1$:

  1. Ground State (Zero Phonons): $J^\pi = 0^+$.
  2. One-Phonon State: A single $2^+$ phonon excitation with energy $\hbar\omega_2 = \hbar\sqrt{C_2/B_2}$: $$E(1\text{ phonon}) = \hbar\omega_2, \quad J^\pi = 2^+$$
  3. Two-Phonon State: Coupling two identical quadrupole bosons ($l_1 = 2, l_2 = 2$). By Bose-Einstein symmetry for identical phonons, only even total angular momenta are allowed: $$J^\pi = 0^+, \quad 2^+, \quad 4^+$$ In a pure harmonic vibrator, this forms a degenerate triplet at exactly twice the single-phonon energy: $$E(2\text{ phonons}) = 2\hbar\omega_2, \qquad \frac{E(4^+)}{E(2^+)} = \frac{E(0^+_2)}{E(2^+)} = \mathbf{2.00}$$

In real vibrational nuclei (such as ${}^{106}\text{Pd}$ or ${}^{114}\text{Cd}$), anharmonic terms split the triplet, but the ratio remains very close to $E(4^+)/E(2^+) \approx 2.0\text{ to }2.2$.

§5.7 Deformed Nuclei, Nilsson Model, Rotational Bands & Backbending

1. Permanent Deformation and the Nilsson Model

In nuclei with many valence nucleons far from closed shells (rare-earth region $150 < A < 190$ and actinide region $A > 220$), the residual nucleon-nucleon quadrupole interaction overcomes the spherical pairing force, locking the nuclear core into a permanently deformed shape (typically an axially symmetric prolate ellipsoid).

Sven Gösta Nilsson (1955) extended the shell model to an axially deformed harmonic oscillator potential parameterized by the quadrupole deformation parameter $\delta$ (or $\beta_2$):

$$V_{\text{Nilsson}} = \frac{1}{2} M \left[ \omega_\perp^2 (x^2 + y^2) + \omega_z^2 z^2 \right] - C \vec{l}\cdot\vec{s} - D \vec{l}^2$$

Because spherical symmetry is broken, total angular momentum $j$ is no longer a good quantum number. Only the projection of angular momentum along the nuclear symmetry axis ($\Omega = j_z$) and parity $\pi$ are conserved. Single-particle states are classified by the asymptotic Nilsson quantum numbers:

$$\Omega^\pi [N, n_z, \Lambda]$$

where $N$ is total oscillator quantum number, $n_z$ is quanta along symmetry axis, and $\Lambda$ is orbital projection ($j_z = \Lambda \pm 1/2$).

2. Nuclear Rotational Bands

A permanently deformed, axially symmetric even-even nucleus rotates collectively perpendicular to its symmetry axis. The quantum rotational energy spectrum is governed by the rotational Hamiltonian:

$$E(I) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2\mathcal{I}} I(I+1)$$

Because the prolate ellipsoid is symmetric under $180^\circ$ rotation about any perpendicular axis ($\mathcal{R}$-parity), only even spin states are allowed in the ground-state band ($K = 0$):

$$I^\pi = 0^+, \quad 2^+, \quad 4^+, \quad 6^+, \quad 8^+, \quad 10^+, \dots$$

The energy ratio between the first two excited states is universal:

$$\frac{E(4^+)}{E(2^+)} = \frac{4(5)}{2(3)} = \frac{20}{6} = \mathbf{3.333}$$

Observation of $E(4^+)/E(2^+) \approx 3.33$ is the definitive experimental hallmark of a rigid nuclear rotor.

3. The Backbending Phenomenon at High Angular Momentum

The empirical moment of inertia $\mathcal{I}$ of deformed nuclei is approximately $40\text{ to }50\%$ of the rigid-body value $\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}$, due to pairing correlations that produce nuclear superfluidity.

As the nucleus is spun up to high angular momentum ($I \sim 14\text{ to }16\hbar$), the colossal Coriolis force $\vec{F}_C = -2 M (\vec{\omega}\times\vec{v})$ acts with opposite sign on time-reversed paired nucleons in high-$j$ intruder orbitals ($1i_{13/2}$ neutrons). At a critical rotational frequency $\omega_c$, the Coriolis force breaks the pair (Coriolis Anti-Pairing effect) and aligns their spins along the rotation axis.

This abrupt alignment increases the nuclear moment of inertia toward the rigid-body value, producing a dramatic S-shaped curve when $\mathcal{I}$ is plotted against $\omega^2$—a phenomenon known as backbending.

Solved Problem Example 5.1: Shell Model Predictions for Ground State Spins and Magnetic Moments

Using the Extreme Single-Particle Shell Model with spin-orbit coupling: (a) Determine the ground-state spin and parity $J^\pi$ for the three odd-$A$ nuclei:

  1. Nitrogen-15 (${}^{15}_7\text{N}_8$)
  2. Potassium-39 (${}^{39}_{19}\text{K}_{20}$)
  3. Bismuth-209 (${}^{209}_{83}\text{Bi}_{126}$)

(b) Calculate the theoretical single-particle Schmidt magnetic dipole moment $\mu_{\text{Schmidt}}$ in units of $\mu_N$ for each of these three nuclei. (c) Compare each calculated Schmidt value with the experimental measurement: $\mu_{\text{exp}}({}^{15}\text{N}) = -0.283\text{ }\mu_N$, $\mu_{\text{exp}}({}^{39}\text{K}) = +0.391\text{ }\mu_N$, $\mu_{\text{exp}}({}^{209}\text{Bi}) = +4.111\text{ }\mu_N$, and comment on the sign and agreement.

(a) Shell Filling and $J^\pi$ Predictions:

1. ${}^{15}_7\text{N}_8$:

Neutrons: $N = 8$ is a magic closed shell ($1s_{1/2}^2 1p_{3/2}^4 1p_{1/2}^2$). Protons: $Z = 7$ has a hole in the $1p_{1/2}$ shell (capacity 2, contains 1 proton). Valence proton is in $1p_{1/2}$ ($l = 1, j = 1/2$). Parity $\pi = (-1)^l = (-1)^1 = -1$. Predicts: $J^\pi = 1/2^-$. (Experiment: $1/2^-$).

2. ${}^{39}_{19}\text{K}_{20}$:

Neutrons: $N = 20$ is a magic closed shell. Protons: $Z = 19$ has a single proton hole in $1d_{3/2}$ ($l = 2, j = 3/2$). Parity $\pi = (-1)^2 = +1$. Predicts: $J^\pi = 3/2^+$. (Experiment: $3/2^+$).

3. ${}^{209}_{83}\text{Bi}_{126}$:

Neutrons: $N = 126$ is a magic closed shell. Protons: $Z = 83$ has one valence proton outside magic $Z = 82$ in $1h_{9/2}$ ($l = 5, j = 9/2$). Parity $\pi = (-1)^5 = -1$. Predicts: $J^\pi = 9/2^-$. (Experiment: $9/2^-$).

(b) Schmidt Magnetic Moment Calculations: Using proton $g$-factors $g_l = 1, g_s = +5.5857$:

1. ${}^{15}\text{N}$ (Proton in $p_{1/2}$, $j = l - 1/2$ with $l=1, j=1/2$):

$$\mu = \frac{j}{j+1}\left[ (j + 3/2)g_l - \frac{1}{2}g_s \right]\mu_N = \frac{1/2}{3/2}\left[ 2(1) - \frac{1}{2}(5.5857) \right]\mu_N$$
$$\mu = \frac{1}{3}\left[ 2 - 2.7928 \right]\mu_N = \frac{-0.7928}{3}\mu_N \approx \mathbf{-0.2643\text{ }\mu_N}$$

2. ${}^{39}\text{K}$ (Proton hole in $d_{3/2}$, $j = l - 1/2$ with $l=2, j=3/2$):

$$\mu = \frac{j}{j+1}\left[ (j + 3/2)g_l - \frac{1}{2}g_s \right]\mu_N = \frac{3/2}{5/2}\left[ 3(1) - 2.7928 \right]\mu_N$$
$$\mu = \frac{3}{5}\left[ 0.2072 \right]\mu_N \approx \mathbf{+0.1243\text{ }\mu_N}$$

3. ${}^{209}\text{Bi}$ (Proton in $h_{9/2}$, $j = l - 1/2$ with $l=5, j=9/2$):

$$\mu = \frac{j}{j+1}\left[ (j + 3/2)g_l - \frac{1}{2}g_s \right]\mu_N = \frac{9/2}{11/2}\left[ 6(1) - 2.7928 \right]\mu_N$$
$$\mu = \frac{9}{11}\left[ 3.2072 \right]\mu_N \approx \mathbf{+2.624\text{ }\mu_N}$$

(c) Comparison with Experiment:

  • ${}^{15}\text{N}$: $\mu_{\text{Schmidt}} = -0.264\text{ }\mu_N$ vs $\mu_{\text{exp}} = -0.283\text{ }\mu_N$. The sign is correctly negative and the numerical agreement is outstanding ($< 7\%$ error), characteristic of light, tightly bound closed-shell nuclei.
  • ${}^{39}\text{K}$: $\mu_{\text{Schmidt}} = +0.124\text{ }\mu_N$ vs $\mu_{\text{exp}} = +0.391\text{ }\mu_N$. Both are positive.
  • ${}^{209}\text{Bi}$: $\mu_{\text{Schmidt}} = +2.624\text{ }\mu_N$ vs $\mu_{\text{exp}} = +4.111\text{ }\mu_N$. The discrepancy is due to core polarization of the large 82-proton/126-neutron core.
Solved Problem Example 5.2: Rotational Band Energy Levels and Moment of Inertia of Erbium-164

The experimental excitation energies of the lowest ground-state band levels of the deformed even-even nucleus ${}^{164}\text{Er}$ are:

$$E(2^+) = 91.4\text{ keV}, \quad E(4^+) = 299.4\text{ keV}, \quad E(6^+) = 614.4\text{ keV}, \quad E(8^+) = 1024.7\text{ keV}$$

(a) Evaluate the experimental energy ratios $E(4^+)/E(2^+)$ and $E(6^+)/E(2^+)$ and compare them with the predictions of an ideal quantum rotor. (b) From the $2^+$ excitation energy, compute the effective nuclear moment of inertia parameter $A_{\text{rot}} \equiv \frac{\hbar^2}{2\mathcal{I}}$ in $\text{keV}$. (c) Assuming a rigid prolate ellipsoid of mass $M = A M_N$ and radius $R_0 = 1.2 A^{1/3}\text{ fm}$ with $\beta_2 = 0.30$, the rigid-body moment of inertia is $\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}} \approx \frac{2}{5} M R_0^2 (1 + 0.31\beta_2)$. Compute $\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}}$ and determine the ratio $\mathcal{I}_{\text{eff}} / \mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}$. Explain why $\mathcal{I}_{\text{eff}} < \mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}$.

(a) Experimental Energy Ratios:

$$R_{4/2} = \frac{E(4^+)}{E(2^+)} = \frac{299.4\text{ keV}}{91.4\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{3.276}$$
$$R_{6/2} = \frac{E(6^+)}{E(2^+)} = \frac{614.4\text{ keV}}{91.4\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{6.722}$$

For an ideal rotor with $E(I) = A_{\text{rot}} I(I+1)$:

$$R_{4/2}^{\text{ideal}} = \frac{4(5)}{2(3)} = \frac{20}{6} \approx \mathbf{3.333}, \qquad R_{6/2}^{\text{ideal}} = \frac{6(7)}{2(3)} = \frac{42}{6} = \mathbf{7.000}$$

The empirical ratio $R_{4/2} = 3.28$ is within $1.7\%$ of the ideal rigid rotor value $3.33$, definitively confirming that ${}^{164}\text{Er}$ is a well-deformed collective rotor.

(b) Effective Rotational Parameter $A_{\text{rot}}$:

$$E(2^+) = A_{\text{rot}} [2(3)] = 6 A_{\text{rot}} \implies A_{\text{rot}} = \frac{91.4\text{ keV}}{6} \approx \mathbf{15.23\text{ keV}}$$
$$\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mathcal{I}_{\text{eff}}} = 15.23\text{ keV}$$

(c) Rigid-Body Moment of Inertia and Comparison: For ${}^{164}\text{Er}$ ($A = 164$):

$$R_0 = 1.2 (164)^{1/3} = 1.2 \times 5.474 \approx 6.568\text{ fm}$$
$$M R_0^2 = (164 \times 938.92\text{ MeV}/c^2) (6.568\text{ fm})^2 = 153983 \times 43.14 / c^2 \approx 6.643 \times 10^6\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2/c^2$$

Rigid moment of inertia:

$$\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}} \approx \frac{2}{5}(6.643 \times 10^6)(1 + 0.31 \times 0.30) = 2.657 \times 10^6 \times 1.093 \approx 2.904 \times 10^6\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2/c^2$$

In energy units:

$$\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}} = \frac{(\hbar c)^2}{2 c^2 \mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}} = \frac{38938\text{ MeV}^2\cdot\text{fm}^2}{2 \times 2.904 \times 10^6\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2} = \frac{38938}{5.808 \times 10^6}\text{ MeV} \approx 6.704 \times 10^{-3}\text{ MeV} = \mathbf{6.70\text{ keV}}$$

Comparing effective and rigid moments:

$$\frac{\mathcal{I}_{\text{eff}}}{\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}} = \frac{\hbar^2 / 2\mathcal{I}_{\text{rigid}}}{\hbar^2 / 2\mathcal{I}_{\text{eff}}} = \frac{6.70\text{ keV}}{15.23\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{0.44} = \mathbf{44\%}$$

Physical Explanation: The effective moment of inertia is only $44\%$ of the rigid-body value. This dramatic reduction occurs because atomic nuclei are BCS-type superfluids. The pairing force between identical nucleons in time-reversed orbits creates a paired superconducting-like condensate: when the nucleus rotates, only the unpaired particles outside the condensate drag with the rotation, while the paired core flows irrotationally, sharply reducing the effective moment of inertia.

Solved Problem Example 5.3: Quadrupole Phonon Spectrum and Anharmonic Splitting in Cadmium-112

In the even-even nucleus ${}^{112}\text{Cd}$, the ground state has $J^\pi = 0^+$. The first excited state is at $E(2_1^+) = 617.5\text{ keV}$. Around $1.3\text{ to }1.4\text{ MeV}$, a nearly degenerate triplet of states is observed:

$$E(0_2^+) = 1224.4\text{ keV}, \quad E(2_2^+) = 1312.4\text{ keV}, \quad E(4_1^+) = 1415.6\text{ keV}$$

(a) Identify the phonon nature of these states in the Bohr-Mottelson collective vibrational model. (b) Calculate the ideal harmonic vibrator predictions for the energies of the two-phonon states based on $E(2_1^+)$. (c) Calculate the energy ratios $E(0_2^+)/E(2_1^+)$, $E(2_2^+)/E(2_1^+)$, and $E(4_1^+)/E(2_1^+)$ and analyze the anharmonic energy shifts.

(a) Phonon Classification:

  • The ground state ($0^+$) is the zero-phonon vacuum state $|0\rangle$.
  • The first excited state $2_1^+$ at $617.5\text{ keV}$ is the one-phonon state carrying $\lambda^\pi = 2^+$ and energy $\hbar\omega_2 = 617.5\text{ keV}$.
  • The triplet $0_2^+, 2_2^+, 4_1^+$ corresponds to the coupling of two identical quadrupole phonons ($|2^+ \otimes 2^+\rangle$). Bose-Einstein symmetry restricts total angular momentum to even values: $J^\pi = 0^+, 2^+, 4^+$.

(b) Ideal Harmonic Predictions: In an ideal harmonic quadrupole vibrator:

$$E(2\text{ phonons}) = 2 \hbar\omega_2 = 2 \times 617.5\text{ keV} = \mathbf{1235.0\text{ keV}}$$

All three members of the two-phonon multiplet are predicted to be degenerate at $1235.0\text{ keV}$.

(c) Experimental Ratios and Anharmonic Analysis:

$$R(0_2^+) = \frac{1224.4\text{ keV}}{617.5\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{1.983}$$
$$R(2_2^+) = \frac{1312.4\text{ keV}}{617.5\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{2.125}$$
$$R(4_1^+) = \frac{1415.6\text{ keV}}{617.5\text{ keV}} \approx \mathbf{2.292}$$

Anharmonic Shift Analysis:

  1. The average energy of the two-phonon triplet is $\langle E_2 \rangle = \frac{1224.4 + 1312.4 + 1415.6}{3} = \frac{3952.4}{3} \approx 1317.5\text{ keV}$, giving an average ratio $\langle R \rangle \approx 2.13$, remarkably close to the harmonic expectation of $2.00$.
  2. The splitting of the triplet ($\Delta E = 1415.6 - 1224.4 = 191.2\text{ keV}$) is caused by cubic and quartic anharmonic terms in the collective potential energy surface (such as $V_{\text{anh}} \propto (\alpha_2 \otimes \alpha_2 \otimes \alpha_2)_0$), which partially couple vibrational phonons to underlying quasiparticle degrees of freedom.

★Solved Examination Problems: Chapter 1